How it works

From a new posting to a reviewed draft, with a record of every step.

Four stages. The first takes you fifteen minutes, once. The other three run on every solicitation that matches your rules.

Load your profile

You upload the documents your firm already has: capability statement, past performance write-ups, key staff resumes, certifications, and any past proposals you are proud of. You enter your NAICS codes, set-aside statuses, the states and agencies you sell to, and your go/no-go rules in plain language, for example "no bids under $50,000", "no work requiring a security clearance", or "only training and organizational development scopes".

Each document is hashed, normalized into page-anchored text with layout blocks, and chunked into overlapping passages that are indexed for hybrid lexical and vector retrieval in a partition that belongs to your firm alone. Rules are stored as structured conditions, not free text, so they evaluate the same way every time. Originals are kept byte-for-byte and used for nothing else.

Opportunities arrive scored

Scout checks SAM.gov and your configured portals on a schedule, within each source's published rate limits, and downloads every attachment for anything new. Fit reads each posting against your rules and documents and produces a score with written reasons: which rules passed, which failed, and what in your past performance is closest to the scope.

Hard rules run first, deterministically, and short-circuit before any model is called. Only opportunities that pass are scored by a model on fixed dimensions with cited reasons. You see a short list, not a firehose. A daily digest lists the fits. You mark each one go or no-go; the decision, the score, and the reasons are stored together as a labeled record.

Matrix and draft are built

For every go, Compliance segments the package by its own structure, selects every sentence containing obligation language, and structures each into a requirement record with verbatim text, category, due kind, and source span. The set is hashed into a matrix version. Drafter then writes outline and first-draft sections one requirement at a time, retrieving passages from your documents and attaching span-level citations to each sentence. Reviewer re-verifies every sentence independently, exact-matches numbers and names against their spans, computes which requirements have no addressing sentence, and measures page counts with the export renderer.

PackagePDF · DOCX · XLSXpage-anchored textSegmentationUCF A–M or headingspage ranges keptCandidateslexical: shall · must · willimperatives · instructionsStructuringlarge model · temp 0requirement.v1 schemaByte checkverbatim == source spanelse record rejectedMatrix vNsha256 of all recordsdiff on amendmentcodemodelSelection is exhaustive and lexical; the model only structures what code has already selected.
Requirement extraction. One model stage, bounded on both sides by deterministic code.

COMPLIANCE MATRIX · 5 of 41 requirements shown · illustrative sample, not a live solicitation

RefRequirement (verbatim)TypeDueStatus
L-1Offeror shall submit a technical volume not exceeding 15 pages, 12-point font, single-spaced.FormatWith proposalAddressed
L-2Offeror must provide three past performance references for work of similar size and scope within the last five years.Past performanceWith proposalAddressed
C-4Contractor shall designate a Program Manager with a minimum of five years of relevant experience.StaffingWith proposalGap
K-9Offeror must complete and sign Section K representations and certifications.FormsWith proposalAddressed
M-2Questions shall be submitted in writing no later than 10 calendar days before the closing date.DeadlineClosing minus 10 daysAddressed

You review and submit

You edit the draft in place; each edit is recorded with its before and after text. Flagged sentences are yours to source or delete, and cannot be exported without a per-sentence acknowledgement. When you export to .docx or .pdf, the file carries a stamp in its footer and metadata: matrix version hash, Ledger sequence number, and Ledger head hash. You submit through the portal yourself. EveryShall holds no portal credentials and has no submit function.

The Ledger for that bid now holds the ingestion record, the fit reasoning, the matrix, every draft sentence with its source, the review findings, your edits, and the export. If anyone asks why the proposal says something, the answer is one click away.

What it does not do

Limits, stated up front

EVERYSHALL RUNTIME · one firm partitionScoutFitComplianceDrafterReviewerLedgerTools: normalize · retrieve · evaluate rules · renderno tool has network egress except declared connectorsPublic sourcesSAM.gov · portalsread onlyYour exports.docx · .pdfledger .jsonProcurement portalsubmissionno path from runtimeYousubmitsreview + edit
Trust boundary. Sources are read only; exports go to you; the runtime has no path to any procurement portal. Submission is yours.

It does not submit

By design. Submission is an act with legal weight that belongs to a named person at your firm.

It does not price

Cost volumes and pricing strategy are yours. The matrix will tell you what the pricing volume must contain; it will not fill in numbers.

It does not guarantee accuracy

Extraction and drafting will sometimes be wrong. The flags, the Reviewer, and the Ledger exist so that errors are visible and traceable, not so that they never happen.

It does not cover every portal

Connectors are added one at a time. The Platform page lists exactly what is live.

We are onboarding a small number of pilot firms.

Bring a live solicitation to the first call. We will build its compliance matrix while you watch.

Request access